<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kubuntu Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tuxteam.com/2008/10/09/kubuntu-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tuxteam.com/2008/10/09/kubuntu-issues/</link>
	<description>IT Life &#38; Linux Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://tuxteam.com/2008/10/09/kubuntu-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matir.wordpress.com/?p=71#comment-58</guid>
		<description>All of the problems you&#039;ve described are fixed in KDE 4.1. The panel is fully resizeable in every way imaginable, the menu can be replaced with a KDE 3.5 style menu. And the launchers are easy to do, although I would have to be sitting at my KDE desktop to describe it to you, which I am not.

Just my two cents now: I don&#039;t give a hoot that any particular person prefers KDE over GNOME or vice versa. Personal preference is just that: personal. I like KDE. You like GNOME. It&#039;s all good. My problem with the Ubuntu devs has been that they make changes to core libraries without consideration for KDE breakage. This most recent change is ridiculous. A significant change in a core library after beta release is just stupid.

If Ubuntu/Canonical doesn&#039;t want to support Kubuntu, that&#039;s cool, too. Stop paying lip service to &quot;supporting Kubuntu&quot; if you&#039;re not going to. It&#039;s that simple. Don&#039;t flirt with it if you&#039;re not ready to seal the deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the problems you&#8217;ve described are fixed in KDE 4.1. The panel is fully resizeable in every way imaginable, the menu can be replaced with a KDE 3.5 style menu. And the launchers are easy to do, although I would have to be sitting at my KDE desktop to describe it to you, which I am not.</p>
<p>Just my two cents now: I don&#8217;t give a hoot that any particular person prefers KDE over GNOME or vice versa. Personal preference is just that: personal. I like KDE. You like GNOME. It&#8217;s all good. My problem with the Ubuntu devs has been that they make changes to core libraries without consideration for KDE breakage. This most recent change is ridiculous. A significant change in a core library after beta release is just stupid.</p>
<p>If Ubuntu/Canonical doesn&#8217;t want to support Kubuntu, that&#8217;s cool, too. Stop paying lip service to &#8220;supporting Kubuntu&#8221; if you&#8217;re not going to. It&#8217;s that simple. Don&#8217;t flirt with it if you&#8217;re not ready to seal the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhkfin</title>
		<link>http://tuxteam.com/2008/10/09/kubuntu-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>rhkfin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matir.wordpress.com/?p=71#comment-57</guid>
		<description>For menu: check lancelot (plasmoid-lancelot, I think, from some PPA repository)

I think the toolbar resize has been fixed in SVN, not sure though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For menu: check lancelot (plasmoid-lancelot, I think, from some PPA repository)</p>
<p>I think the toolbar resize has been fixed in SVN, not sure though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
