<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TuxTeam.com &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tuxteam.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tuxteam.com</link>
	<description>IT Life &#38; Linux Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OOXML Debacle</title>
		<link>http://tuxteam.com/2008/10/09/ooxml-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://tuxteam.com/2008/10/09/ooxml-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matir.wordpress.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of issues going on around OOXML these days.  Specifically, there&#8217;s alledged copyright violations by posting the OOXML specs by members of the Boycott Novell group.  I want to address a specific issue: why is something applying for ISO standardization so secret? International standards (e.g., ISO) should be open and royalty-free.  It&#8217;s ridiculous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of issues going on around OOXML these days.  Specifically, there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.linuxpromagazine.com/online/news/ooxml_documentation_iso_concerned">alledged copyright violations</a> by posting the OOXML specs by members of the Boycott Novell group.  I want to address a specific issue: why is something applying for ISO standardization so secret?</p>
<p>International standards (e.g., ISO) should be open and royalty-free.  It&#8217;s ridiculous if there&#8217;s a &#8220;standard&#8221; that&#8217;s locked in to a single vendor.  Can someone explain any sanity to this situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxteam.com/2008/10/09/ooxml-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
